I have been through a whole lot last year. 2006 is officially the most miserable year of my life. If we can chart our life in a Cartesian graph, with x = time and y = (-1, 1) to signify absolute negative to absolute positive, I hope that last year remains to be my life's absolute minimum.
While I enjoy the happy times (>0), I do think that it is important to have frustrating times (<0). Without the down points, one could not possibly appreciate the many wonderful things in life that we take for granted.
If I draw another graph, with x = the y-axis of my Life graph, y = number of friends, the resulting graph looks like a Bell curve. When I am at my lowest point, most people drift away, until finally there remains only my family and one handful of folks who are my friends. Similarly, one gains many friends as life become positive, but as one drifts towards fantastically happy times, one also gains many enemies, and as such y would also tends towards 0.
If we consider the ratio of number of friends / time, we have the rate of friend acquaitance, and at least for myself, that's the happiest of all times. Mapping this, it appears that the sweet spot would be around -0.3.
Nerd point aside, we find something equally interesting. To find one's closest friend, either fuck up your life, or become extremely successful. You can immediately identify who's friend and who's foe. Obviously, you cannot control your life (as you are not a controlled subject). However, examining one's history, on the other hand, will allow you to discover.
While I have been in very desperate moments, I am grateful that I have identified my friends. They have been there to support me in every way possible. I am also deeply grateful to those who have the patience to work with me. I don't know how I could have gone through all these without them.
Saturday, April 28, 2007
Friends and family
Monday, April 23, 2007
Coming Out
About sixteen to seventeen years ago, when I was fourteen, I came out to my parents that I am gay. About six to seven years ago, during the years of my early adulthood, I came out to my co-workers that I am a designer who uses a PC. Until this day, I do not have the nerve to tell a single person at an AIGA event that I have never bought a Mac in my life.
Point.
Posted by
SML
at
12:58
0
comments
Labels: design, gay, mac, operating systems, pc
Friday, April 20, 2007
Went nuts
Logic system went nuts on monday.
At least, normal logic system went nuts on monday.
I think that I got back to normal right now. At least, I have invited an ex-lover of mine to step back into my life to verify that I was nuts on Monday. I called my ex-lover today to negate a theory I had on Monday. The test goes like this: if he agrees with my sister, which negates my theory, and that based on evidence that supports my believes on Monday, he should not negate my theory, then it implies that since he and my sister both negate my theory, my theory must not be true. Hence, I must be crazy to think that my theory holds. Thus, my theory does not hold.
For now, only my ex-lover knows 10% of what my theory is about. But since everyone I know who has encountered my theory thought that I went nuts, I am so far certain that I must be nuts. As such, I guess, I am dissing my theory for now.
I would like to thank Derek for this. He is nut enough to come over and help me with this. I need to remind myself to write a song called "Perfect" for him. To be clear here, it's the word that he would never use. He taught me about the idea of being non-absolute. Perhaps, the song ought to be called "absolute," but that sounds like some kind of vodka campaign, and i know that he'd prefer Stolichnaya.
Posted by
SML
at
02:10
0
comments
Labels: crazy, health, life, See-ming Lee
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Sampling
To be certain that I am not crazy and imagining things, I started sampling myself two weeks ago. I bought a Sony MZ-M200 MiniDisc player and press Record when I start my day of work. I am very glad to know that I am not crazy, and most definitely am not paranoid. WIHWWIH (What I heard was what I heard). Best-spent 350.00 this year.
Interestingly, this MiniDisc player also helped me with one aspect that I didn't realize before. It sounds like (pun intended) that when people don't understand what I am talking about, they have absolute right to not understand. Because I don't know WTF I was talking about either.
It appears that although I can organize (and thus edit) my paragraphs, the '(pause) I have seven points to make. One, ...' gene from my Dad has not been transferred. If the idea that the better gene will always win out, then this suggests two things: 1. This theory is wrong; or 2. This skill is not necessarily a good skill. This is interesting. Both ought to be explored.
It appears that I have side-tracked.
Back to sampling. Sampling is great. It allows you to record a ton of amazing materials. Things that just went by. Things that you so wish you could have a record of--for example, that horse-like laughter--but never had the opportunity to got recorded in this case. Going through a day of materials seem like a lot at first, but visually looking for peaks in Sony Sound Forge is so easy. The fact that verison 8 now allows for scripting made this even easier.
I also couldn't help but notice just how noisy the a/c is in the office. Setting the noise gate at -18db still doesn't get rid of the hum. But perhaps that has to do with M-200's auto leveling. Perhaps I should bring my sound meter to work to verify instead.
I suddenly understand why people subject themselves to be videotaped on the Web. While I'm not gutsy like they are, I am certainly considering videotaping myself. Anyhow, the point is, sampling is good. Good for personal improvement, good for fueling audio production, good for sanity check. Good for life.
Sunday, April 08, 2007
Manhattan Bridge HDR
Ah, but Google, you are so kind.
Searching on Manhattan Bridge HDR on Google today puts my Flickr photo on the first result. No wonder this photo is getting a huge bump on the number of views recently.
Posted by
SML
at
21:27
0
comments
Labels: Google, hdr, photography
Suicide
Three weeks ago, I committed suicide. OK, that's not exactly true. I seriously considered suicide. No, that's not exactly true either. I seriously looked at different methodologies to make a suicide attempt painless with guaranteed success.
I have considered options before, but I never researched and Googled possible avenues. I didn't do it for two reasons. One, I still haven't manage a perfect way to die that is painless and with higher than 99% of success rate. But to get out of research mode, was because at the time I was working on my Bloomingdales project and I don't want to be known at my funeral as the person who did not finish my project. Or worse, that no one attended my funeral because I didn't finish that project. That'd be bad.
So it looks like that I have just found a way to avoid committing suicide. As long as I stay busy with work, I won't do it. Ah, but I only work on projects that's award worthy. Well, if not award worthy, at least press worthy. Projects like the Bloomingdales installation does not get awards. Innovation is about setting categories that won't reside in award categories, right? This reminds me that there were so many times that when the award submission time comes, I cannot find a suitable category for my projects. Maybe that's a good sign.
Just remembered, Bloomies project also got a mention on a Red Herring article today. That's awesome. Please keep on feeding my mental happiness. I'll need it.
I beat last year
Ah, it looks like that I beat last year. I wrote a new entry within less than a year. ten months this time. that's good.
Posted by
SML
at
20:19
0
comments
Labels: blogging
Friday, June 30, 2006
Functional = Beautiful
Living objects found in nature took their form not by how attractive they are aesthestically, but how useful their functions are. Yet, almost everything we find in nature is stunningly gorgeous. Man-made objects often sacrifice functionality to keep its beautfiul form, but is statistically less beautiful than living things. Why?
, and Manhattan Bridge is an ongoing subject for me. It is a functional utilitarian object created not for its beauty, but for its function. Like nature, living things take their forms not by its appeal, but by its necessity.
Posted by
SML
at
16:26
0
comments
Labels: aesthetics, philosophy, theory
On photography
Photography is a very good and effective way to study composition.
I started using photography as a mean to study composition when I bought my first digital camera. For the first time, I was able to capture and review my visual decisions instantly. The immediate visual feedback is powerful
For most people, photography brings back memories of particular moments and events. For me, photography brings back memories of how I used to see. It serves as a visual diary of how I interpret what my eyes see. It enables me to analyze and criticize my visual decisions, and enables me to catalog my progress along the way.
Posted by
SML
at
15:59
0
comments
Labels: aesthetics, philosophy, photography
Theorizing aesthetics
I have always had an idea of theorizing aesthetics. I believe that aesthetic judgement, though seemingly abstract, can be quantified. And through the discovery of these aesthetics principals, it is possible to programmatically create aesthetic composition through programmatic algorithms. My goal, for this continuing study, is ultimately to create the art generator.
Artists don't like this view of the world. The larger part of the design community, will in fact tell you that designers should be ashamed of themselves if their designs were formed by theory. I, on the other hand, believe that it should in fact be seen as an advantage.
The music communite has created many variants of algorithm-based music generators (http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-camusic/) Artists have long utilize color theories in their paintings. Itten, from the Bauhaus, wrote a monumental book called The Elements of Color on the subject matter. The language of architecture and urban planning was eloquently catalogued in Christopher Alexander's A Pattern Language. This book on architecture has in turn inspired four programmers (Gang of Four) to write a book called Design Patterns, which revolutionized the object-oriented programming space. So why is the art and design community so afraid of composition theories?
Posted by
SML
at
13:49
0
comments
Labels: aesthetics, art, design, patterns, philosophy, photography
Education before college
I grew up in Hong Kong, and the education system allows for two focus-path: science or arts. The science track is formed by subjects like Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Advanced Mathematics. Most everything else is grouped into arts: history, geography, literature, etc. The arts category seem odd at first, so I formulize the categorization in my way: by the kind of tests given to the students. Subjects that allow you to score an A by answering the only possible answer is Science. Subjects that have a larger range of flexibity in the form of essays, and usually graded subjectively is categorized as Arts.
High school was to be the stepping stone to getting into a great university. In order to achieve the goal, I have decided to go with the path that will allow me to get good grades given equal study efforts. My early education, before I entered college, was thus constructed by a science-biased view.
I never really dream to be a scientist, however. Almost everything that I did in my spare time had nothing to do with science. Instead, they are all about arts. My life was surrounded by music, and I spent most of my time as a pianist for choirs, choruses, ballet schools, etc. Although I was never really good at it, I also tried to draw, sketch and paint. I find the experience very relaxing.
Posted by
SML
at
13:31
0
comments
Labels: art, education, science, See-ming Lee
Friday, April 22, 2005
Better Windows OS
It looks like that I have now found my OS replacement: the Directory Opus 8, developed by an Australian company GPSoftware. Their Web site can use some help considering that their shell product is so usable (though it can use some interface tweaks so as not to overwhelm the users with features - but in the same time not hide features for users)
http://www.gpsoft.com.au/
Posted by
SML
at
20:55
0
comments
Labels: operating systems, windows, xp
Brian Loube's abstract expressionistic 3d photography + digital art opening
It was a joy to see the work. Very inspiring and wish I had the time to contribute. I'm immediately seeing letterforms through a sequence, tiled to form the alphabets. Given 72frames, a lot of possibilities are possible. Can even previsualize a derivitaor from parents, a la my GaraFurura. Or perhaps airport messages. Gotta go back and look at the 'Dots' again. Very high potential in those.
Posted by
SML
at
20:51
0
comments
Labels: art, Brian Loube, thoughts
Sunday, October 10, 2004
Making better Windows OS
When Windows is first installed, the taskbar is set to display at the bottom of the screen, but like most users, it soons becomes so crowded that it becomes unusable.
I have been placing the taskbar along the left rail for quite a while now. It's not only more usable (you identify applications by their icon anyhow) it also saves more screen real estate (assuming that you are not using an LCD in portrait mode).
One improvement that Microsoft can probably provide is if I have multiple instance of Explorer, IE or Firefox open, I can selectively colorize the application from default taskbar color (i use the silver scheme) to another -- similar to color-labeling a folder on the Mac -- that way they will be much more identifiable without even looking at the name.
I wonder why the folders do not have similar features also.
Posted by
SML
at
04:06
0
comments
Labels: operating systems, user interface, windows
cigarettes, glass and candles
when cigarette smokes become texture on lowly-lit glass.
Posted by
SML
at
01:28
0
comments
Labels: art, life, love, photography